This blog highlights the research of Dichotomy Capital. Dichotomy Capital is managed by Ian Clark. The research presented on this site is not investment advice. Please do your own due diligence. If there are any questions about the fund or the research please use the contact form or email us at info@dichotomycapital.com.
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Yellow Media (TSE:Y) Update
I believe buying Yellow Media(Y), either in the common shares or warrants, is an attractive investment today. Although the company was written up before, I thought I would expand my commentary.
The company has completed their recapitalization. Debt maturity was extended to 2018 and total debt was reduced by 54%. This will result in $45M less interest paid each year. The company is still generating significant free cash flow and even though the main business is dying there may be an overreaction by Mr. Market.
Effects of the Recapitalization
Overall the recap lowered debt by $1.5 billion. The company now has $800M (9.25%) senior secured notes and $107.5M of senior convertibles (8% per year or PIK 12%). All together they will pay $82.6M in interest per year.
Interest expense should drop though because the company has forced debt repayment. As mentioned in their filings, there is a bi-annual cash sweep that will be used to pay down debt. The minimum payment is $100M in 2013, $75M in 2014, and $50M in 2015 for a minimum payment of $225M over the next three years in some fashion. So it should look something like this:
Interest expense is simply for senior notes. Total interest expense would add back $8.6M each year for the converts.
According to the covenants, this minimum will get paid as long as there's at least $75M in cash on the books. At the end of Q4 2012 they had $106.8M of cash on their books.
It has been mentioned twice (covenants and in the Q3 2012 Call) that there is a 75% excess cash sweep. So the real question is how much cash can the business generate?
Business Analysis
The business is divided into two segments, Print and Online. Obviously Print is not doing so well and is seeing double digit declines on an annual basis. It's tough to peg a firm number on decline rate. I'll try to estimate 2013 free cash flows.
1. In 2012 online revenues were $367.3M, up from $346.1M in 2011 or a 6% increase. Management has guided for growth of roughly 11% per year. It seems reasonable to conclude that with increased focus on the business the company can grow online revenues at least 4% and perhaps 11%.
Scenario 1(low): Revenue in this segment grows 4%. $367M*1.04 = $381.9M
Scenario 2(high): Revenue in this segment grows 11%. $367M*1.11 = $407.3M
2. Print. Ah print. This segment was declined considerably. In 2010 the print segment was doing $1,184M in revenue and it dropped to $740.7M of revenue in 2012. That's a drop of roughly 20% per year. Year over year I calculate that print dropped 24.5%(2011 had print revenues of $982M, this declined $241.3M). As another reference point, a decline of 20% per year is also what DEXO and SPMD forecast (Slide 13).
Scenario 1: Print declines by 35% next year(40% higher than this years decline): $740.7M *65% = $481.5M
Scenario 2: Print declines the same as it did this year (~25%) in the past two years. $740.7M*75%= $555.5M
3. Print revenues are expected to be 50% of total revenues by 2014, according to the Q2 2012 conference call. EBITDA margins are right around 50% and management expects this to go down into the 40's as they transition to online but they do not give a bottom figure. In the 2011 Annual Report (pg 29) Y states "most of our new online placement products contribute margins similar to those of our print products in our local markets."
I think EBITDA will go down but end up being somewhere between 40%-50%. In 2010 and 2009 online revenues were about 30% of revenues and EBITDA was over 54%. It seems reasonable that EBITDA margins will not drop much lower than 40%.
Scenario 1: EBITDA margins plummet to 40%
Scenario 2: EBITDA margins only drop 2% from 2012's average of 51% and end up being 49%.
Therefore in those two scenarios EBITDA will be...
Scenario 1: $381.9M + $481.5M = $863.4M*40% = $345.3M
Scenario 2: $407.3M + $555.5M = $962.8M*49% = $471.7M
(Both of these revenue and EBITDA calculations are below 2013 consensus. My hope is to come up with an independent assessment)
I think EBITDA will be between $345M-$471M. This is compared to a company that has $106M of cash and we know has $800M of long term debt and $87M of outstanding debentures. Enterprise value (assuming a market cap of ~$200M) is right around $1.0B. This implies a forward EV/EBITDA multiple of 2.8X-2.0X.
CapEx was $42.5M for 2012, and $68.8M for 2011.In the Supplemental Disclosure management breaks down CapEx. If we believe that 2012 is accurate due to the closure of Canpages, than CapEx could be around $45M in 2013(rounding up).
Interest is straight forward. They will pay up to $74M on the senior notes per year and $8.6M on the convertibles. Therefore Interest is at most $82.6M and will be less depending on the amount of debt paid off.
Taxes were guided to be $60M in 2013 and $80M in 2014 in the Q4 Supplementary Disclosure.
So cash available to pay down debt is:
Scenario 1: $345.3M-$45M-$82.6M-$60M = $157.7M
Scenario 2: $471.7M-$45M-$82.6M-$60M = $284.1M
75% of the excess cash is well above the minimum $100M required to pay off. Based on Scenario 1, I estimate that by Sept 2013(the second date of debt repayment) total LT debt should be less than $700M, reducing interest expense by $9M per year.
It's cheap, but so what?
The main reason one avoids a dying business is a lack of flexibility and inevitable squandering of capital by management to pursue "growth opportunities." The later is not as much of an issue because the new covenants force management to pay down debt and prevent management from taking on new debt. This should help prevent any large acquisitions. Good thing, if we use the Canpages acquisition as a template, management has proven to be poor capital allocators.
Discussions with IR indicate that there is more flexibility than one would think. Yellow Media does not own printing presses nor is it bound to them (see DEXO). Therefore if a business segment (say Montreal Yellow Pages print distribution) becomes unprofitable, management can shut it down and focus on segments that are still making money.
While there will be a slight lag (and thus a slight drop in EBITDA margins), management has shuttered unprofitable segments. I think the proof of this can be seen in the lower decline in EBITDA margins compared to print revenue declines.
Downside
It would be sloppy to not address the potential downside here. I think the easiest way to imagine downside is to send the print business to zero and let online growth simply stay the same. I'll have to make a few vague assumptions here but my point doesn't change too much.
If print goes zero and online revenues stay the same, the result is revenues will be ~$360M. Management has told me there are few hard fixed costs. So I will assume that EBITDA margins come in at 40%. Even that is draconian compared to margins that have largely stayed the same.
So EBITDA is $360M*40% = $144M.
Interest would be $74M because the Senior Convertibles have a PIK toggle. If the print business goes to zero I'm willing to bet management would "toggle on."
CapEx would probably be cut to only "Sustaining Capital Expenditures" of ~$20M (this is just the annualized rate of sustaining Capital Expenditures on page 4 of the Supplementary Disclosure for Q3 2012).
So earnings before taxes would be $144M-$17.5M-$74M = $52.5M. I can't imagine that much of any taxes would be paid. Either way it doesn't matter.
If this happens in the next three years they most likely default because they can't pay the mandatory minimum payments of $100M, $75M, and possibly $50M in 2013, 2014, 2015 respectively. Remember, they need to keep a minimum of $75M of cash in the bank. They've got $106M right now. So if print goes to zero TODAY they may survive for one year, but probably not two, and definitely not three.
Conclusion
It seems unlikely that the print business will go to zero over the next 3-12 months. Given the large number of subscribers (309,000) it's likely that the current rate of attrition can be extrapolated forward. I can only base this on what has happened the past couple of years and what similar companies (DEXO/SPMD) are predicting. Businesses can and often do fail faster than expected.
The million dollar question is: Will online revenues grow enough to transform a dying business with a small online segment into an online advertiser with a small dying print segment? I believe Q4 showed that print is going to die a slow death, one that hopefully can be milked. The company deserves a discount because cash flows may be squandered. At this price my models and research lead me to believe that Yellow Media is very undervalued.
I've also started to dig into DEXO/SPMD. The new company could offer an interesting hedge and/or investment I hope to dig deeper into the newly combined company over the next couple of months.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thanks Graham, your work on Yellow Media is very well done.
ReplyDeleteYou mention that online grew 6.1% from 2011 to 2012, but "On a comparable basis, excluding the impact of the changes to the Canpages business, the LesPAC.com divestiture, the sale of Deal of the Day, and YPG USA, online revenues grew 15.7% versus the same period last year. Online revenues represented approximately 38% of total revenues during the fourth quarter of 2012, compared to 29% in 2011."
ReplyDeleteGiven the above, i'm not so sure your 4-11% range for online growth is reasonable. I'd have to go with a higher 8-15% range or something of that nature personally.
You can calculate that the sold-divisions reduced total revenue by 60M. Of that, 33M came from online and 27M came from the print side (You can solve for these numbers this by using the organic numbers for online and revenue that the company provided). Applying that extra 27M to the print side when calculation the 2-year percentage drops has a small impact but worth including as well.
One more thing: You used revenues from 2010 and 2012 to calculate a "revenue drop percentage" but you also did not account for the very large sale of "Trader Corporation" in March 2011. That sale was for over 750M and must have consisted of very considerable revenues (on both print and online sides).
DeleteIf not adjusted for this, the revenue decline calculation would be off significantly as well.
-Fernando
Ah yes, I to mention that the 24.5% was from 2011-2012. Thank you!
DeleteI have corrected it. Year over year print revenues dropped 24.5% in the print business. Since Trader Group was divested in March this is reasonably close to organic decline in my opinion. It may be more it may be less, but it gives us a starting point to model.
Thanks for the feedback. I think it's conservative to continue using 4-11%. The actual results saw growth of 6.1% and that's all that matters to me. In my opinion, comparable basis is just management spin. The bottom line is, if you owned the business you would have seen a 6.1% increase in revenues, not 15.7%.
ReplyDeleteIf next year the results show actual growth of 15% then my model will be updated. Until then I would rather be conservative. If it's cheap at 4% growth isn't it that much better if they surprise to the upside(I have no idea if they will or will not)?
The foundation of value investing is finding a business that is cheap under conservative scenarios. I hope that Yellow Media is just that.
-GC
Fair enough. I tend to be conservative in my modeling as well, I like upward surprises. Its just that while I am conservative when deciding "Is there value here", I try to be as accurate as possible when judging "Just how much value is there here" in order to best come to terms with my exit points.
ReplyDeleteI tend to create a "best reasonable estimate" first and then create bands of "Reasonable chance of going wrong" and "Reasonable chance of going right" events -- then gauging how that impacts my valuation in order to come to terms with the sensitivity of the investment. This also helps me determine a "bail point" if I find the numbers becoming worse than what I project.
One assumption with Yellow Media is that online is growing, but i have yet to see them break down how much of that gain in online is from print customers switching over. How many new online accounts did Y get last year from companies who were never printed ad customers?
ReplyDeleteOverall revenue decline means customers arent spending as much on Yellow Media ads as they were in the past.
Given Marc Tellier's ability to annihilate shareholder value, you must discount a lot of the cash flow value, and that is what the market is doing.
Y could be a buy here, but the senior notes are getting 9 % interest , indicating a very high risk in this interest environment.
In Q2 2012's conference call ALJ Capital asks "How much of that(print revenue decline and online revenue increase) is organic or how much of that is new customers versus kind of existing?"
ReplyDelete"One we track it very, very, very closely and given the fact that we’re unfortunately still in a net advertiser loss for modeling purpose. You can assume that the great, great, great majority of that is the existing customer base." -Marc Tellier
I've gotten quotes to advertise in multiple cities in both print form and online. Without going into details, switching to online saves the customer ~50%. Mathematically, based on the growth of online vs. the decline of print, this makes sense.
I look at this like a LBO. Management is forced to pay down debt, reducing Tellier's ability to squander cash (perhaps his strongest managerial trait). Management has indicated to me that they will not do a large acquisition and I have made it very clear that I believe they should just pay down debt.
I have also been going through a lot of demographic data in the main population centers in Canada. We know that the main print user is someone aged 50-70. Taking the % of the population in Canada between 50-70 years old and applying a death rate from standard actuarial tables may give a hint of eventual print decline.
My analysis indicates it won't fall off a cliff but die a slow death.
As far as the senior notes yielding 9%: my research indicates that the majority of the senior notes are held by banks. Those same banks hold the common. I think this is a very confused shareholder base. All just my opinion though.
Management is admitting that the majority of the move in online growth was attributed to print customers switching and reducing the amount spent on advertising with Yellow Media.
ReplyDeleteForecasting that online will continue to grow at rates over 10% or better is speculation at best. Yellow Media is offering packages that have both online and print advertising platforms. How they breakdown growth in both segments in that situation is management spin.
The bottom line is:
If customers dont see profits from their advertising via Yellow Media , they will continue to seek other avenues for advertising.
How Tellier has kept his job is a mystery to me, and to the street... and i think the main reason for Yellow Media;s ultra low valuation. Give this incompetent money drain his pink slip and you would see an immediate gain in share price. But jmho
"Forecasting that online will continue to grow at rates over 10% or better is speculation at best."
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure if that was directed towards me or management, regardless I disagree. There are 108,000 customers using the online platform(end of Q4 2012). This compares to 64,000 customers (19%) using the online platform at the end of Q4 2011. That's substantially higher than 10% growth.
In the past 12 months ~17,000 new customers joined. Let us assume that every single one of those new customers goes online. That's well over 10% growth.
"If customers don't see profits..."
I think that's pretty obvious. I've talked with a bunch of customers. Some plan on switching, some have switched, some refuse to switch. Yellow Pages is just another medium for advertising. It's not the best, it's not the worst but it is attractively valued.
Even with Tellier at the helm it hasn't failed and today it is safer and better capitalized. All just my opinion of course.
-GC